DrillKit is an AI-powered tool that turns your online lesson chat from Zoom, Google Meet, Skype, or Microsoft Teams into professional, print-ready ESL lessons in under 30 seconds. It automatically extracts vocabulary, generates exercises (gap-fill, error correction, vocab match, word formation, and more), and produces beautiful PDFs tailored to the student's CEFR level and native language.

Does DrillKit support Zoom chats?

Yes! Simply copy the chat text from your Zoom, Google Meet, Skype, or Microsoft Teams lesson and paste it directly into the input area. You can also paste vocabulary lists or handwritten notes. DrillKit's AI strips out timestamps, sender names, and other noise automatically.

Can I export lessons to PDF?

Absolutely. Every lesson is generated as a high-quality, print-ready PDF. Pro users can also export to Google Docs and customize branding with their school logo and accent colors.

Which languages are supported?

DrillKit supports translations in 11 languages: Spanish, French, German, Italian, Portuguese, Japanese, Korean, Chinese, Arabic, Turkish, and Russian. The AI auto-detects the student's native language from the chat transcript.

What exercise types can DrillKit generate?

DrillKit generates 11 exercise types: Gap Fill, Vocab Match, Error Correction, Sentence Completion, Multiple Choice, Word Scramble, Sentence Reorder, Translation, Word Formation (Cambridge Part 3), Key Word Transformation (Cambridge Part 4), and Dialogue Builder.

How does the AI extract vocabulary from chat transcripts?

The AI scans your pasted chat transcript, strips out noise (timestamps, reactions, media placeholders), identifies teachable vocabulary, phrasal verbs, idioms, and student errors, then scores each item by relevance. You review and select the best items before generating exercises.

Is DrillKit free to use?

Yes! The free plan includes 20 generations per month with full access to all 13 exercise types, all lesson styles, and custom branding. The Pro plan ($4.99/month or $3.33/month billed yearly) unlocks unlimited generations and priority AI processing.

Can I customize the lesson with my school branding?

Pro users can add their school or institution name, choose custom accent colors, select from 5 lesson styles (Standard, Classic, Modern, Playful, Academic), and add footer text to every generated lesson.

Teaching Used To vs Would vs Be Used To in ESL: Clear Guide

The Triple Confusion

Students encounter three structures containing 'used' that all seem to relate to habits — and the confusion is understandable. 'I used to smoke' (past habit — I don't anymore). 'I would smoke after dinner' (past repeated action — nostalgic recall). 'I'm used to waking up early' (I'm accustomed to it — present state). The first two describe past habits but with different nuances. The third describes a present state of familiarity. Students blend them into a single mental category, producing errors like 'I'm used to smoke' or 'I used to living here.' Separating these structures clearly is essential for B1-B2 accuracy.

The Three Structures Decoded

⬅️

USED TO + infinitive = Past Habit (Finished)

'I used to play tennis.' (I played regularly in the past, but I don't anymore.) Works for both habits AND states: 'I used to live in Paris.' 'She used to be shy.' The habit/state is OVER — that's the key meaning.

🔄

WOULD + infinitive = Past Repeated Action

'Every summer, we would go to the beach and swim for hours.' Nostalgic, narrative flavor. ONLY for repeated actions, NOT states: 'We would live in Paris' is WRONG. Cannot be used for past states — only 'used to' works there.

✅

BE USED TO + gerund/noun = Accustomed To (Present)

'I'm used to waking up early.' (It's normal for me now — I'm accustomed to it.) 'She's used to the noise.' About the PRESENT — how familiar something feels NOW. Followed by -ing or a noun, NEVER an infinitive.

lightbulb

Teacher Tip

“Ask: 'Am I talking about THEN or NOW?' If THEN (past habit that stopped): 'used to + infinitive' ('I used to smoke'). If NOW (current familiarity): 'be used to + -ing' ('I'm used to the noise'). For 'would': it only works for REPEATED past ACTIONS (not states) and adds a nostalgic, storytelling tone. If they can replace it with 'used to' and it still makes sense, either works — but 'would' sounds more literary.”

Frequently Asked Questions

What is the difference between used to and be used to?

add

'Used to' + infinitive describes past habits that have stopped: 'I used to drink coffee' (I don't anymore). 'Be used to' + gerund/-ing describes present familiarity: 'I'm used to drinking coffee in the morning' (it's normal for me now). Different tenses, different forms, different meanings.

When can I use would instead of used to?

add

Use 'would' for repeated past ACTIONS only: 'We would play football every Sunday.' NOT for past states: 'I would be shy' is wrong (use 'I used to be shy'). 'Would' adds a nostalgic, storytelling tone and works best in narratives about the past.

When should I teach these structures?

add

Teach 'used to' at B1 (past habits). Teach 'be used to' at B1-B2 (present familiarity). Teach 'would' for past habits at B2 (it's a stylistic addition, not essential). Always contrast them explicitly to prevent confusion.

Used To, Would, and Be Used To: Three Structures That Look Similar But Aren't